Posts tagged "fisheries"

Fisheries affected by Covid-19 to receive relief funding

August 8th, 2020 Posted by Uncategorized 0 comments on “Fisheries affected by Covid-19 to receive relief funding”

SACRAMENTO–An forecasted $18 million in federal easing funding will be made available for aquaculture transactions, contract boat proprietors, fish customers and licensed commercial-grade fishermen who lost income due to the effects of the Covid-1 9 pandemic. The fund will be made available to eligible recipients through the California Department of Fish and Wildlife( CDFW ).

The state is receiving its $18 million of succor monies through the$ 2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security( CARES) Act stimulus package.

“CDFW estimates that there are more than 11,500 potentially eligible applicants for this funding, including individuals who work in the offshore, shoreside, aquaculture, commercial-grade fare fishing barrel and guide areas, ” CDFW staff said in a secreted statement.

An applicant for succor funding must demonstrate at least a 35 percent loss of fishing-related income, between Jan. 1 and June 30, due to Covid-1 9. The applicant must also demonstrate, through documentation, they are actively involved in one of the qualifying sectors.

Applicants must also provide the most up-to-date address information by Aug. 17.

“The Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission( PSMFC) is serving as fiscal agent for these funds. PSMFC will forward claim forms to all potentially eligible applicants to the address on file with CDFW, ” according to CDFW staff. “Forms and documentation must be returned within 30 periods to be eligible for disbursement. Following the closing of the 30 -day response period, final disbursement totals will be calculated and easing checks will be issued to qualified applicants.”

CDFW staff can be reached via email at CARESfisheriesinfo @wildlife.

Coastal states receive $3 million for recreational fisheries data collection

June 28th, 2020 Posted by Uncategorized 0 comments on “Coastal states receive $3 million for recreational fisheries data collection”

WASHINGTON, D.C.–Pacific, Atlantic and Gulf coast governments have reportedly received an additional$ 3 million( blended) in federal funded for recreational fisheries the data collected, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration( NOAA ). The funding was realized possible by the Modernizing Recreational Fisheries Management Act of 2018( or Modern Fish Act ).

NOAA Fisheries, under the Modern Fish Act, must establish state-federal partnerships to improve recreational fisheries data collection.

“The agency’s Marine Recreational Information Program develops, improves and implements a structure of recreational trawl investigations to estimate total recreational catch, and maintains such partnerships through Regional Implementation Teams, ” NOAA Fisheries organization was indicated in a released statement.

“These investment funds will support the highest priorities these crews have substantiated, ” the statement continued. “They will likewise boost nation specialized cross-examine platforms that allow recreational anglers to submit information through electronic technologies.”

Funds were precisely distributed to regional fisheries structures, via existing agreements.

The Pacific Coast Recreational Fisheries Information Network, for example, are able to obtain $ 900,000 “to restore sampling tiers to increase the precision of appraisals produced by recreational fishing inspections in California, Oregon and Washington.”

Other curricula receiving funding are the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program ($ 900,000) and Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Information Network ($ 1.2 million ).

“The Marine Recreational Information Program and its Regional Implementation Teams will be working to determine how to distribute the funds among the territory sampling programs, ” NOAA Fisheries personnel stated. “While recreational fisheries the data collected has been impacted by Covid-1 9- with several territories suspending or modifying their shoreside and at-sea sampling programs in accordance with neighbourhood social distancing guidelines- we anticipate these funds will be applied once in-person data collection has fully resumed.”

ACE Act earns approval of full U.S. Senate

January 24th, 2020 Posted by Uncategorized 0 comments on “ACE Act earns approval of full U.S. Senate”

WASHINGTON, D.C.–Two days ago we reported under the aisle of America’s Conservation Enhancement Act, or the ACE Act, out of a U.S. Senate committee. It didn’t make long for the same proposal to gain the approval of the entire U.S. Senate, as the ACE Act moves forward to the House of Representatives.

The ACE Act would move on to the White House if a majority of Representatives approve the bill, which is seen by national fishing campaigners as a program advantaging anglers.

Portions of the greenback focus on regional trawl or conservation matters, but there are two issues of national concern: pas fishing tackle and the National Fish Habitat Partnership program.

The ACE Act could create a national exemption for “unwarranted federal regulations and bans” of result fishing tackle, in accordance with the American Sportfishing Association( ASA ).

“Lead fishing tackle, which is commonly used in nearly all forms of fishing and constitutes no national threat to wildlife populations or human health, would be exempted from unwarranted federal regulations and proscribes, ” ASA personnel said during the following statement supporting the ACE Act.

California has been entertaining a ban on lead fishing tackle for several years. Lead fishing tackle was on the roster of entries the state’s Department of Toxic Element Control foresaw settling or banning; the listed pieces were announced as part of a 2015 policy study.

An Assembly member planned a statewide restriction on the manufacture, auction or acquire of fishing weights and sinkers in 2018, but the bill didn’t advance out of the legislative process. Several questions have been raised in association with fishing tackle ban suggestions. Is there direct exhibit join the existence of lead fishing tackle to the loss of habitat or wildlife, for example?

At least six other regimes- Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont and Washington- have also attempted to regulate or censor pas fishing tackle.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service propagandized to ban lead fishing values on federal shores in Pres. Barack Obama’s final days in the White House. The program, however, was overruled a short period of time last-minute, when Pres. Donald J. Trump became the nation’s chief executive.

The ACE Act had the opportunity to ensure permission of the National Fish Habitat Partnership program.

“This is a state- and locally-driven conservation initiative that stores the on-the-ground fish habitat restoration project which provide benefits recreational trawl possibilities, ” ASA organization said in the following statement supporting the ACE Act. “Federally authorizing this program with key plan betterments will help make sure of the program’s future success.”

Other elements of the ACE Act focus on recovery and conservation of the Chesapeake Bay and compiling fisheries data in the Great Reservoir region.

Read more:

U.S. Senate committee advances fishing conservation bill

January 3rd, 2020 Posted by Uncategorized 0 comments on “U.S. Senate committee advances fishing conservation bill”

WASHINGTON, D.C.–Passage of America’s Conservation Enhancement Act, or ACE Act, out of the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Slog on Dec. 17 was hailed as a great victory for recreational net. The proposal, if ultimately supported by Congress and the White House, would are supportive of fisheries programs and protections on fishing tackle.

One of the senatorial authors of the bill stated the ACE Act would protect fish habitats from invasive genus, promote fish conservation and facilitate recover endangered or threatened species.

“The ACE Act … enshrines in regulation collaboration among public agencies and other interested gatherings that promote fish conservation.[ It] also includes studies that will help inform how to improve successful maintenance and recovery of endangered or endangered categories, ” Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyoming, said.

Barrasso, who is chair of the Environment and Public Piece Committee, introduced the ACE Act with Sen. John Carper, D-Delaware.

Several fishing and outdoors bands expressed support of the ACE Act, in particular the American Sportfishing Association( ASA ).

“Multiple bipartisan wins were included in this major legislation such as the authorization of the National Fish Habitat Partnership program and providing assistance to platforms important to fisheries preservation in the Great Pond and the Chesapeake Bay, ” Mike Leonard, ASA’s vice president of government things, said during a liberated statement.

The National Fish Habitat Partnership program is one of the key elements of the ACE Act. The management platform provides funding for restoration activities, both national and regionally.

The ACE Act would also exempt contribute fishing tackles from federal regulations or proscriptions, according to an ASA statement on the proposal( which is chaptered as S. 3051 ).

A restoration program to clean up the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries was also included in the ACE Act. The fisheries of the Great Lake would receive support from the ACE Act, as well- particularly in fisheries data collection and biological assessments.

The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Drudgery vote was unanimous. The ACE Act now goes to the full Senate for a vote.

Other the rules of the ACE Act addressed hunting and other outdoor-based recreational activities.

Read more:

Six environmental organizations sue federal agencies over California water project

December 24th, 2019 Posted by Uncategorized 0 comments on “Six environmental organizations sue federal agencies over California water project”

SAN FRANCISCO–The Trump administration and two federal agencies were litigated by six environmental organizations on Dec. 2, with plaintiffs claiming the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration( NOAA ), National Marine Fisheries Service( NMFS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service authorizing a irrigate job in California at the expense of native fish species.

The Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Association and Natural Assets Defense Council lead a federal prosecution against NOAA, NMFS and others to the long-term runnings of Central Valley Project and State Water Project in California; the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

All six plaintiffs are claiming the federal ocean campaigns were politically motivated and contravened the Endangered Species Act.

“Contrary to the requirements of the Endangered Species Act … the biological rulings at issue in this case were blatantly and improperly mold by political incitements and authorize spray programme enterprises that will cause grave is detrimental to species and their critical environment, increasing the risk of extinguishing of endangered and threatened salmon, steelhead and Delta Smelt, ” the lawsuit stated.

The jobs at issue, according to the lawsuit, would divert “massive amounts of water” from a structure of canals, dikes and tanks to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta for agricultural and borough uses.

“The operations of the Water Projects have caused ravaging environmental impacts and have contributed to severe refuses in California’s native fish species, various of which are now rostered as endangered or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act, ” the complaint territory. “[ The] sea job activities ought to have major factors in the decline of the endangered Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon( “winter-run Chinook salmon” ), peril Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon( “spring-run Chinook salmon” ), peril Central Valley steelhead, or endangered Delta Smelt, and in the listing of these and other genus under the Endangered Species Act.”

Other harms of the federal irrigate assignments, according to the lawsuit’s plaintiffs, include reduced in-stream flows, reduced Delta outflow, increased salinity stages and habitat loss.

NMFS biologists, according to plaintiffs, published a 1,123 -page opinion in July, territory the federal sea proposal would likely “jeopardize scheduled salmon and steelhead, as well as Southern Resident killer whales, and was likely to destroy or adversely modify critical environment, in violation of the Endangered Species Act.”

Plaintiffs alleged NOAA, NMFS and other federal officials of not following the biologists’ recommendations.

“[ The] biological mind included a reasonable and prudent alternative demand added protective measures and differences in Reclamation’s proposed plan in order to avoid such negative impacts to listed species, ” the lawsuit against NOAA, NMFS and the White House territory. “But instead of adopting that biological belief, which had been signed by multiple staffers and cleared by Fisheries Service advocates, political nominees at the Fisheries Service and the Interior Department short-circuited required procedures, removed most of the scientists working on the biological ruling, and turned the findings and conclusions of staff biologists.”

Institute for Fisheries Aid, Gold State Salmon Association, Defenders of the Wildlife and The Bay Institute too participated the lawsuit as plaintiffs.

Read more:

Gov. Newsom appoints Mike McGuire to fisheries commission

September 5th, 2019 Posted by Uncategorized 0 comments on “Gov. Newsom appoints Mike McGuire to fisheries commission”

SACRAMENTO–California Gov. Gavin Newsom has appointed State Sen. Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, to the Pacific Commonwealth Marine Fisheries Commission. McGuire, 40, has acted as the chair of the Joint Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture since 2014.

The Pacific Country Marine Commission was established by an routine of Congress in 1947 to manage resources associated with the Pacific Ocean. It does not have management or regulatory jurisdiction but the commission does facilitate its general discussion and gathering on fishery aids. The commission’s works be financed by federal concessions, special contracts and oweds paid by member states, according to its mission statement.

There are five member states on the commission: California; Oregon; Washington; Alaska; and, Idaho. Three commissioners represent all those states; California’s three members are McGuire, Department of Fish and Wildlife Chair Charlton H. Bonham and Barbara Emley, an individual.

McGuire previously sufficed on the Sonoma Board of Supervisors( 2010 -2 014) and was mayor of Healdsburg( 2006 ). He gave a masters degree from the University of San Francisco.

The appointment is not reimbursed and asks State Senate confirmation.

Read more:

Book Rentals